1. My friends and I like to argue about a great many things indeed, but here are a few, The origins of the universe, GreenPeace and saving sharks from horrible fates at the hands of finers,Obamas health care, Is there other life in the universe, and as of late the Catholic churches Petaphile scandal.
2.well I think there is a god and the big bang theory is only explained by a god who made the big bang.... I think that Green Peace should at all costs stop the fin soup market...There is other life in the universe....The health care bill is weak and unsastainable.....And the scandal with the catholic leaders is pathetic and so wrong what the ____ are they thinking?
3.I think it wrong when people assume that we are the only ones in the Universe..I think that shark fin soup is not worth the mass removal of an entire branch of the food chain..it is wrong to assume that there is no life other places in the universe because its so big we might not ever know but, the numbers sugest that there is on way there is not other forms of life..the health care bill is all wrong..and the preist that offended should be removed and charged.
4.I wish I could convince everyone of these views.
5. I am definitly opposed to the opposite veiws on thses subjects
6.someone believes that I am wrong on my veiws: however, I am right! lol
7.The university should help save the sharks!
8.we should pass a law that completely saves the sharks

Blog assignment for 4-6-10 analysis response

This student paper is a very good one in my opinion. They have utilized many of the important parts of the rhetorical analysis process.They maintain a very good academic tone they make good use of professional sounding words. The word that they use in my opinion really help the writer sound credible smart and compitant. There is a very good academic tone that is keep throughout the piece. They have encluded the rhetorical situation and all of the parts like the intended audience, the place where the speach was given, they also have the reason behind why the speach was given(which is a really good one.) Also included in the rhetorical situation the date and place that the speach was given and the name of the person giving the speach, which is very good. The rehtorical tool are all mentioned early in the paper which helps us know the layout that the paper should follow and then they do a good job of folloing that layout, they did a wonderful job with that and the transitions wich made it for a easy read for me. They have done a super job of ramping up and down for the most part wich helped the paper run smooth and make sense. The use of quotes really set the author apart as a credible source. They included ther page nubers in which the quotes could be found, which is a good practice to do. Each body paragraph touches each rhetorical tool seperately and gives strong examples.They do a perfect job with the conclusion they dont copy the intro paragraph and they have a unique way of opening the conclusion(not saying in conlusion, or I close by......) so overall in my elementry opinion this piece follows all the rules that I understand about rhetorical analysis well.